On November 5, 2015 the Securities and Exchange Commission issued an Investor
Bulletin entitled “Variable Annuities – An Introduction.” This publication of the SEC Office of
Investor Education Advocacy follows on the heels of prior publication of the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (FINRA) including Regulatory Notices and Investor Alerts warning investors about the pitfalls of investing in a variable
This Investor Bulletin notes the following potential downsides:
- Short-term investors should never purchase variable annuities as early withdrawals subject the
investor to penalties, surrendered charges and taxes.
- Unlike a fixed annuity, variable annuities are not guaranteed products as their underlying
sub-accounts are subject to fluctuations in the financial markets.
- Variable annuities are also subject to complex tax rules and consequences.
- Features such as living benefits may be illusory and complex and small investors looking for life
insurance might be better off purchasing inexpensive term insurance.
Variable annuities are investment products, comprised primarily of mutual fund sub-accounts, and also
have certain insurance features. In reality, less than five percent (5%) of all variable annuity
investors ever properly annuitize payment streams from their variable annuities while paying upfront
purchase commissions (loads) and annual combined fees expenses and charges which are amongst the highest
in the financial markets.
We offer a free initial consultation to investors who feel they have been victimized by being
invested in variable annuity products. For a free initial consultation contact the Law Offices of
Timothy J. O’Connor at (518) 426-7700.
Have a Question?
- SEC Issues Required Investor Disclosures for Variable Annuities and Variable Life Insurance Contracts
- Airbnb Guest Injuries
- Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Agrees to $5,000,000 Settlement Fund to Benefit Harmed Investors
- Will Contests – Have You Been Shorted by Trickery Involving a Loved One’s Estate?
- Class Action Lead Plaintiff is Successful in Thwarting Effort of Massachusetts Mutual Seeking to Dismiss Claims